Movies Rule
Films · Streaming · Screens
newsMonday, November 2, 2026·3 min read

Andy Weir on Star Wars: Why Repeating Monumental Wars Undermines the Saga

Andy Weir argues that Star Wars risks losing impact by repeatedly launching new epic wars after each victory, a flaw that could shape future films.

Star Wars Episode 1
Photo: Eva Rinaldi Celebrity Photographer

Andy Weir, author of The Martian and Project Hail Mary, recently shared his take on the Star Wars franchise in an exclusive interview. He pinpointed a single structural flaw: the pattern of ending one galaxy‑spanning conflict only to launch another soon after. The comment came amid ongoing debates about the sequel trilogy, the recent Mandalorian series, and upcoming film projects. If the franchise continues this cycle, each victory may feel temporary, potentially eroding fan investment.

What happened

Andy Weir, fresh off the success of the Project Hail Mary film adaptation and the upcoming Audible series Exoplanet, was asked what he would change if he ran the Star Wars franchise. He answered that the core problem is the franchise’s habit of concluding a monumental war only to immediately introduce a new one, leaving audiences with an unsatisfying sense that previous victories were fleeting.

The observation echoes long‑standing fan criticism of the sequel trilogy, especially the way The Force Awakens set up a new conflict after the original trilogy’s resolution. Recent entries such as The Rise of Skywalker and the Mandalorian have struggled to balance nostalgia with fresh stakes, and upcoming projects—including Simon Kinberg’s reported trilogy—are now being evaluated through the lens of Weir’s comment.

Why it matters

When a saga repeatedly discards the consequences of a hard‑won victory, the emotional payoff for viewers diminishes. This pattern can lead to franchise fatigue, making each new installment feel like a rehash rather than a meaningful progression. Creators who ignore the issue risk alienating both legacy fans and newer audiences seeking lasting narrative stakes.

+ Pros
  • Maintains high‑octane action that keeps casual viewers engaged.
  • Allows for fresh world‑building opportunities with new antagonists.
  • Provides a clear commercial formula that has historically driven box‑office success.
– Cons
  • Undermines the emotional weight of previous victories.
  • Creates narrative fatigue as stakes feel endlessly reset.
  • Reduces long‑term character development and thematic depth.

How to think about it

For creators, consider a “reset‑pause” model: after a major conflict, allow a period of rebuilding that explores the aftermath before introducing the next threat. For fans, evaluate new releases based on how they honor past resolutions rather than merely delivering another showdown. This approach can preserve the saga’s epic scale while giving victories lasting significance.

FAQ

What exactly did Andy Weir say about Star Wars?+
Weir warned that launching a new monumental war immediately after a previous one makes earlier victories feel unsatisfying, risking narrative fatigue.
Why does repeating big wars risk audience fatigue?+
Each new conflict can erase the emotional payoff of the last, leaving viewers with a sense that the story never truly progresses.
How might future Star Wars projects address this concern?+
By incorporating a meaningful aftermath period after major battles, focusing on rebuilding and character consequences before introducing the next threat.
Sources
  1. 01The One Problem With Star Wars, According To Project Hail Mary Author Andy Weir [Exclusive]
  2. 02The One Problem With Star Wars, According To Project Hail Mary Author Andy Weir [Exclusive] - SlashFilm
Keep reading